Reach Us +447897072958
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal

Commentary - (2023) Volume 12, Issue 3

Streamlining Drug Revelation: Reverse Translational Research Offers a Chance and Uses

Wei Wu*
*Correspondence: Wei Wu, Department of Pharmacy, University of Fudan, Shanghai, 201203, China, Email:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Fudan, Shanghai, 201203, China

Received: 02-May-2023, Manuscript No. IJDRT-23-106057; Editor assigned: 04-May-2023, Pre QC No. P-106057; Reviewed: 16-May-2023, QC No. Q-106057; Revised: 22-May-2023, Manuscript No. R-106057; Published: 29-May-2023, DOI: 10.37421/2277-1506.2023.12.404

Introduction

Reverse translational research, also known as reverse translation or benchto- bedside approach, aims to streamline the process of drug discovery and development by bridging the gap between basic science findings and clinical applications. It involves taking knowledge gained from clinical observations or patient data and applying it to guide laboratory-based research and the development of new therapies. Here's how reverse translational research offers opportunities and benefits in the drug discovery process. Reverse translational research allows researchers to identify and validate potential therapeutic targets based on clinical observations or patient data. By analysing patient samples, genetic data, or disease characteristics, researchers can identify specific molecules, pathways, or mechanisms that are associated with a particular disease. Reverse translational research helps identify biomarkers that can be used to predict treatment response, monitor disease progression, or stratify patients into subgroups based on their molecular profiles [1].

Description

By correlating clinical outcomes with molecular or genetic characteristics, researchers can identify biomarkers that have diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive value. These biomarkers guide the development of personalized medicine approaches and enable more targeted and effective treatments. Reverse translational research offers the opportunity to repurpose existing drugs for new indications. By identifying drugs that have shown promising effects in clinical settings different from their original purpose, researchers can expedite the drug development process. Repurposing existing drugs can reduce the time, cost and risk associated with developing entirely new compounds and allows for faster translation into clinical practice.

Reverse translational research provides insights into patient populations that are more likely to respond to specific treatments. By analysing clinical data and patient characteristics, researchers can design clinical trials with appropriate patient selection criteria and endpoints. This ensures that trials are more efficient and targeted, increasing the chances of demonstrating efficacy and obtaining regulatory approval. Clinical trial design and optimization play a crucial role in the development and evaluation of new therapies. Well-designed clinical trials ensure that the collected data is robust, reliable and ethically sound, providing critical evidence for regulatory approval and informing clinical decision-making. Here are some key considerations and approaches in clinical trial design and optimization [2].

Clearly define the primary and secondary objectives of the clinical trial. These objectives guide the selection of appropriate study design, patient population, endpoints and statistical analyses. The objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. Select the most appropriate study design based on the research question and available resources. Common study designs include randomized controlled trials, observational studies, crossover trials and adaptive designs. Consider factors such as patient characteristics, disease progression, treatment duration and ethical considerations when determining the optimal design. Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the appropriate selection of patients who represent the target population. Eligibility criteria may include factors such as age, gender, disease stage, biomarker status previous treatment history. Well-defined criteria help ensure that the study results are applicable to the intended patient population. Randomization minimizes selection bias and ensures the distribution of patient characteristics evenly across treatment groups. Blinding (single-blind or double-blind) reduces bias and maximizes the validity of results. Randomization and blinding techniques help minimize the impact of confounding factors and enhance the reliability of the trial outcomes [3].

Calculate the required sample size based on statistical power calculations and effect size estimates. Adequate sample size ensures sufficient statistical power to detect meaningful treatment effects. Factors such as expected treatment effect, variability, alpha (significance level) and statistical power influence sample size calculations. Define clinically meaningful and scientifically valid endpoints to assess the efficacy and safety of the intervention. Primary endpoints measure the treatment's main effect, while secondary endpoints provide additional information. Endpoints can include clinical outcomes, biomarkers, patientreported outcomes, or surrogate endpoints. Select endpoints that are relevant to the disease being studied and aligned with regulatory guidelines. Develop a comprehensive data collection plan, including case report forms, electronic data capture systems and data monitoring processes. Ensure that data collection is standardized, accurate and reliable. Implement monitoring and quality control measures to maintain data integrity throughout the trial. Define the statistical methods and analyses to be used for primary and secondary endpoints. Prespecify the analysis populations, statistical tests, handling of missing data and adjustments for multiple comparisons. A robust statistical analysis plan ensures unbiased and interpretable results [4].

Reverse translational research helps uncover mechanisms of drug resistance that emerge in patients. By studying patients who do not respond to treatment or develop resistance over time, researchers can gain insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms that drive resistance. This knowledge guides the development of strategies to overcome resistance, such as combination therapies or the identification of alternative targets. Reverse translational research allows feedback from clinical trials to inform and guide preclinical research. Insights gained from clinical studies can be used to refine preclinical models, improve the predictive value of animal models and optimize the design of preclinical experiments. This iterative process ensures that preclinical research remains relevant and aligns with clinical needs [5].

Conclusion

Reverse translational research offers the opportunity to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and clinical applications, accelerating the drug discovery and development process. By integrating clinical observations, patient data and biomarker analysis into preclinical research, researchers can identify and validate targets, repurpose existing drugs, optimize clinical trial design, understand drug resistance and improve the translation of basic science findings into clinical practice. This approach holds great potential to streamline drug discovery and increase the success rate of bringing new therapies to patients.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Liu, Juan, Chao Chen, Tuo Wei and Odile Gayet, et al. "Dendrimeric nanosystem consistently circumvents heterogeneous drug response and resistance in pancreatic cancer." In Exploration 1 (2021) 21-34.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Blair, Jessica MA, Mark A. Webber, Alison J. Baylay and David O. Ogbolu, et al. "Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance." Nat Rev Microbiol 13 (2015): 42-51.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Darby, Elizabeth M., Eleftheria Trampari, Pauline Siasat and Maria Solsona Gaya, et al. "Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited." Nat Rev Microbiol 21 (2023): 280-295.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Durrer, D. and L. H. Van Der Tweel. "Excitation of the left ventricular wall of the dog and goat." Ann N Y Acad Sci 65 (1957): 779-803.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Silva, Lucas Oliveira J., Kristin Scherber and Daniel Cabrera, et al. "Safety and efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for pain management in the emergency department: A systematic review.Ann Emerg Med 72 (2018): 135-144.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref